"One purpose for assessment is to determine the level of text that will challenge student"

- Rubin, Assessment

This article gives a great insight to the three most popular types of assessment:

1. Cloze Test

                                  Recommended for readers struggling in comprehension and vocabulary

2. Running Record

A student is to read a passage (never seen before) and the instructor is to provide critical feedback and scoring

3. Informal Reading Inventories

Evaluate comprehension through post-reading questions and usually report growth

To gain more perspective, I looked at the articles "Pause and Ponder" section. One question asked "What are different ways I can assess reading in my classroom"

I personally believe that there needs to be a collection of base-line data. This data includes comprehension level, vocabulary level, how they learn, and who they are as a student. After the baseline data has been collected, teachers should mediate course work with individual work, partners, and group study time. This will help determine what level the student lies on.  

Organizing assessment data is divided into three sections: independent, instructional, and frustration.

A teacher needs to be aware of what category their student follow, and be prepared for assessment and reassessment. If a teacher understands the reading level of their students, their scores will progress. Allowing students to read below their grade level isn't a bad thing. For example, I am currently in an ESL class. Some students are in 5th but read in a 1st grade level. Yes, that may look bad, but ESL (or L1) learn differently than we do. Their improvement curve will also slop very slowly. 

How can I recognize reading scores that are unreliable?

I believe its by paying attention to your student's needs and levels. What do you think?

 

Guided Reading

In the article Guided Reading in the Balanced Reading Programs by Melissa J. Rickey writes about the constructs of guided reading. Rickey also includes the opinion of Margaret Mooney and how she creates a balanced reading program.

"For example, instead of continuously stopping a read aloud to ask children questions or to generate predictions, Mooney (1994a) suggests that teachers carefully select and plan for presenting books. With their students' needs, interests and attitudes in mind, teachers can read aloud fluently, judiciously demonstrate thinking beyond the text, and take time to receive children's responses and invite them to return to the book at a later time."

This article really pushes the use of guided reading because the author believes it to be the cornerstone of a balanced reading program.

The flexibility in guided reading approaches allows teachers to teach in a variety of different ways that reach students who may not learn like the rest of the class.

By focusing on 'before, during, and after reading', teachers apply repetition to build the reading foundation of students.

How can teachers get students interested in all parts of guided reading, i.e. the introduction, reading, revisiting, discussion.

Pinterest helps in many ways:

 Introduction: This is more for beginning readers. Students can learn these sight words, understand their meaning and then apply them to the story they are reading.

    Discussion: Put students into small groups (maybe 2-3). Whatever the students roll, the students answer.


















In my WLEL class, my professor talked about how sometimes students are spoiled by games and candy. How can we, as teachers, make guided reading interesting without making the lesson a game? or have rewards like candy and trinkets?


http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/literacy/articles/guidedreadinginthebalancedreadingprogram/

Vocabulary Instruction

In the Blanchowitz article, the main point was to promote vocabulary through means of games, student activities, and reading.

Throughout this article, however, I couldn't help but thinking about the group of students that don't like reading. How can we promote reading in a fun way for them, as well as everyone else?

In Dalton's article, it makes it easier to answer that question. The use of technology, direct instruction, and active learning surround almost every kind of instructive learning.

For me, It is really hard to think about computers in the classroom because when I was a student, we only had them in the library. This is something every teacher needs to adapt to. Technology can expand minds beyond school and if this will improve the quality of education, I don't see why not to incorporate it.

Because teachers need to be familiar with technology, research on appropriate games and/or activities should be done. If a game lacks feasibility, or doesn't challenge the student enough (or maybe it is too hard) than a teacher needs to know this ahead of time. Otherwise, they waste precious classroom time.

Here are some things I found:

Super Word Toss is a fun, educational game for kids to practice matching synonyms and antonyms. Kids can choose from two different levels of difficulty before they play. The rules of the game are simple. Get 10 correct matches and choose a new ball! Get 3 incorrect in a row and the game is over!

 Match the prefix and the base word!













Source: http://www.funbrain.com/
http://www.aasd.k12.wi.us/staff/boldtkatherine/readingfun3-6/readingfun_prefixessuffixesroots.htm

November 3, 2014

In the article by Sharon Gill, we begin to understand the Comprehension Matrix and how we can organize our activities into pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading.

Gill also writes about the three theories involved in comprehension: Schema, Transactional,  Constructivist.

I believe that teachers can create an environment that works for all three of these theories.

Schema involves a readers use of prior knowledge to make sense of new information. Teachers could devise a lesson plan that surrounds some elemental part of the story they are reading.

For example, if students watch a video and paint a picture of a butterfly, then read a text about the migrating monarchs, their confusion will be less likely..while an interest increase will be more likely.












Transactional surrounds the idea that different experiences = different meaning. Readers will adopt either a efferent (Take away information) or aesthetic (Take away experiences).
A good example of this is what Halloween means to an American L1 student vs a Spanish L2 student. Latino culture typically do not celebrate Halloween so a teacher must make sure that this holiday is defined to the L2's and that their culture is also described to L1s.

A good way to sort out this theory is by asking; Why am I reading this. A pintrest user created a bookmark/checklist to promote this thought.

Constructivist theory uses the construction of their ow knowledge by making connections. Gill stated that reading, writing, drawing, graphic organizers, etc are a great because they help build and extend comprehension.